Which of the following enhances the effectiveness of an advocacy coalition?

The effectiveness of an advocacy coalition is significantly enhanced by diverse member representation and shared goals. Having a diverse group of individuals or organizations brings in various perspectives, expertise, and resources, which enriches the coalition's ability to address complex issues. Diversity ensures that different voices are represented, fostering innovation and creativity in problem-solving.

Moreover, shared goals are crucial for maintaining focus and direction within the coalition. When all members are aligned with common objectives, it strengthens their commitment and collaboration, making it easier to strategize and mobilize resources effectively. This unified approach enables the coalition to present a stronger and more cohesive front when advocating for policy changes or addressing public issues.

In contrast, maintaining strict control over each member's actions would likely stifle creativity and discourage engagement, while a lack of communication among organizations can lead to misunderstandings, fragmentation, and inefficiency. Lastly, the total independence of each member could undermine the collaboration essential for achieving the coalition's objectives, as it prevents the pooling of resources and coordinated action that is fundamental to effective advocacy. Thus, a well-rounded coalition thrives on diversity and shared goals.